The Proclivities of James White (Part 2)

Two days ago I began laying out the proclivities of James White while in a debate setting with fellow Christians. In that post I offered 15 and in this post I will offer an additional 15. Again, the purpose of sharing this list of JW proclivities is to help prepare any other Christian who wouldContinue reading “The Proclivities of James White (Part 2)”

The Proclivities of James White (Part 1)

In studying Dr. White’s method and approach to fellow Christians regarding the Text and Translation debate coupled with the advice of others who knew Dr. White’s teaching quite well I was able to identify 30 or so proclivities which Dr. White regularly employed. I share these with you first and foremost as a help toContinue reading “The Proclivities of James White (Part 1)”

James White Tries Damage Control with More Birdie Arguments

I was planning on sharing some of my debate notes with you all today and specifically 31 proclivities which JW seems to manifest when talking about the Text and Version debate. But instead, it seems that JW went back to his rabbit hole [i.e., the Dividing Line] yesterday where he and his birdie arguments areContinue reading “James White Tries Damage Control with More Birdie Arguments”

My Initial Takeaways from the Van Kleeck vs White Debate

First, I’d like to thank all those who helped me prepare for this debate. I had an email chain going with 6 other men who really understood James White’s [JW] proclivities. Their advice proved prescient. Then there were those of you who watched/read JW’s material and shared your own insights. Thank you. As for theContinue reading “My Initial Takeaways from the Van Kleeck vs White Debate”

We Made It (Part Duex)

So we made it…again. I have to say that the second time around just isn’t the same. I have to admit, the glow is wearing off. That said, this time we get a longer and more thorough treatment. Yesterday we found out that we are committing those scary category errors and arguing like Muslims. InContinue reading “We Made It (Part Duex)”

We Made It To The Dividing Line

We made it. I mean it’s not like we debated Bart Ehrman or like we debated in a South African Mosque, but we made it. On September 8th, James White spoke of our work here. I mean this is like a dream. I’ve always wanted to be on Dr. White’s Dividing Line. I mean, itsContinue reading “We Made It To The Dividing Line”

Van Kleeck vs. White: The Debate Topic Has Been Determined

“Resolved: The TR as the Word of God is Equal to the NT Autographs” I’m surprised James White took the topic. I don’t think White will say that the TR is not the Word of God. As far as “is Equal to the Autographs”, seeing he has never seen them I’m unsure how he knowsContinue reading “Van Kleeck vs. White: The Debate Topic Has Been Determined”

So I’ve Been Asked to Debate James White

I was approached via email yesterday afternoon by Chris Arnzen of Iron Sharpens Iron Radio and to my surprise was asked if I wanted to debate James White on the topic of Confessional Bibliology. I was surprised why a second stringer was asked rather than Dr. Riddle. Not sure what’s up with that. Anyway, IContinue reading “So I’ve Been Asked to Debate James White”