Category Archives: Uncategorized

Secretariat and 1 John 5:7

On June 9, 1973, was the 105th running of the Belmont Stakes at Belmont Park in Belmont, New York in front of a crowd of 69,138 spectators. Facing a field of five horses, Secretariat won by 31 lengths, the largest margin of victory in Belmont history, and never since approached, winning the Triple Crown ofContinue reading “Secretariat and 1 John 5:7”

DEBATE: Dr. Van Kleeck Jr. vs. Francis Turretin (aka TurretinFan)

Recently I have accepted an invitation to debate Francis Turretin (aka TurretinFan) on Nick Sayer’s YouTube channel. The topic under examination is as follows: “Has God’s Word Been Perfectly Preserved by the Greek and Hebrew Manuscripts or by the King James translation?” The question, as proposed by TurretinFan, needs some work. It is a bitContinue reading “DEBATE: Dr. Van Kleeck Jr. vs. Francis Turretin (aka TurretinFan)”

Reformation Bible Society Paper Presentation Topics

With the Reformation Bible Society’s inaugural meeting fast approaching we wanted to share our paper titles with our readership. Both Dr.s’ Van Kleeck will present papers in their respective fields on the topic of the Septuagint. The title of our papers are as follows: Dr. Van Kleeck Sr. – Andrew Willet (1562-1621) and the ManagementContinue reading “Reformation Bible Society Paper Presentation Topics”

Pastor Christian Khanda Gives a Distinctively Christian Argument for the TR

In the video to follow, Pastor Christian Khanda (OPC) offers a clear and concise argument in favor of the TR. Leaning on Scripture (as all Christians should when it comes to their theological belief) Pastor Khanda shares both exegetical and theological reasons for holding to the TR. Even more, with the help of the interviewerContinue reading “Pastor Christian Khanda Gives a Distinctively Christian Argument for the TR”

Was B.B. Warfield’s View of the Autograph the Same as the Protestant Orthodox?

To answer this question Richard Muller [PRRD, Holy Scripture, pp. 413-414] observes, The case for Scripture as an infallible rule of faith and practice and the separate argument for a received text free from major (i.e., non-scribal) errors rests on an examination of the apographa [i.e., copies of copies] and does not seek the infiniteContinue reading “Was B.B. Warfield’s View of the Autograph the Same as the Protestant Orthodox?”

Andrew Willet (1562-1621), Matthew Poole (1624-1679), and Matthew Henry (1662-1714) and the critical examination of the authorship of 2 Samuel

A recurring maneuver of evangelical apologists for the critical text is to insinuate that those who support a standard sacred text resist or reject reformation era text critical work. This of course is a feckless fallacy of the interlocular. The conspicuous difference between pre-critical and post-critical text critical work is that pre-critical text criticism workedContinue reading “Andrew Willet (1562-1621), Matthew Poole (1624-1679), and Matthew Henry (1662-1714) and the critical examination of the authorship of 2 Samuel”

Reaching the Next Generation

A couple of weeks ago I had the pleasure of sitting down with three students from Virginia Tech. These students attend my Church. They are reformed in theology and presuppositional in their evangelism. Somehow they came across the debate I had with Dr. White and having listened to the debate they had a series ofContinue reading “Reaching the Next Generation”