Category Archives: Uncategorized

To answer this question Richard Muller [PRRD, Holy Scripture, pp. 413-414] observes, The case for Scripture as an infallible rule of faith and practice and the separate argument for a received text free from major (i.e., non-scribal) errors rests on an examination of the apographa [i.e., copies of copies] and does not seek the infiniteContinue reading “Was B.B. Warfield’s View of the Autograph the Same as the Protestant Orthodox?”

A recurring maneuver of evangelical apologists for the critical text is to insinuate that those who support a standard sacred text resist or reject reformation era text critical work. This of course is a feckless fallacy of the interlocular. The conspicuous difference between pre-critical and post-critical text critical work is that pre-critical text criticism workedContinue reading “Andrew Willet (1562-1621), Matthew Poole (1624-1679), and Matthew Henry (1662-1714) and the critical examination of the authorship of 2 Samuel”

A couple of weeks ago I had the pleasure of sitting down with three students from Virginia Tech. These students attend my Church. They are reformed in theology and presuppositional in their evangelism. Somehow they came across the debate I had with Dr. White and having listened to the debate they had a series ofContinue reading “Reaching the Next Generation”

And while we are at it… Scripture > the College of CardinalsScripture > the College of ScholarsScripture > the Conclusions of Textual Criticism Christ is King and His inspired infallible word in our hands is His law.

Over this past weekend I had the opportunity to be on The King’s Men podcast and discuss the anatomy of Christian belief, what the Bible says about itself, and why I read the Bible I read. In this second episode we discuss how a translation can be properly understood as inspired. Blessings.

Over this past weekend I had the opportunity to be on The King’s Men podcast and discuss the anatomy of Christian belief, what the Bible says about itself, and why I read the Bible I read. This is the first episode. Lord willing I will post the second episode tomorrow. Blessings.

Since the Enlightenment, theologically oriented Academia’s trajectory has been to degrade the Christian sacred text through radical humanization. After demonizing the Reformation definition of inspiration described as dictation, (a word used by our Reformation era forefathers that has the explanatory scope to include holy men of God and the Holy Spirit as the creative, activeContinue reading “The Killing of Immediate Inspiration”

“Now the Church must hear Christ’s voice. Christ’s sheep will hear his voice, John 10:16. They will neither hear nor follow a stranger, ver. 5. Christ’s voice is not to be heard but in the Scriptures. Therefore other doctrine must not be received of the Church than is taught and delivered in the Scriptures. ThisContinue reading “Andrew Willet, (1562-1621), on the Sufficiency of Scripture”