Category Archives: James White Debate

In this episode of Word Magazine Dr. Riddle makes seven observations/critiques regarding the recent Peter Van Kleeck vs. James White debate. A synopsis of his seven observations are as follows: 1.) I felt there were many aspects of the debate that were not handled in a fair or evenhanded manner.2.) PVK began his opening statementContinue reading “Dr. Jeff Riddle’s Commentary on the Van Kleeck vs. White Debate”

Recently James White compared me to an atheist for offering an argument in our debate that I had not yet publicly offered, which of course makes total sense. While in the midst of a debate, if you make an argument that JW has never heard before then you are obviously like an atheist he onceContinue reading “Bayes’ Theorem, The Resurrection, and the Textus Receptus”

In this episode Drs. Van Kleeck conclude their commentary on JW’s opening statement.

So I had the delight of hearing our work mentioned again on James White’s Dividing Line yesterday. I have to thank him for continuing in doing so. The fact is, JW is good for StandardSacredText.com. Again, thank you to James White for furthering our cause. As JW recounts it, he yet again “stumbled” upon ourContinue reading “James White’s Hobbit Hole Argument”

In this episode Drs. Van Kleeck begin their commentary on Dr. James White’s opening statement.

On October 3rd James White [JW] gave us more air time on the Dividing Line, again. Around the 42 minute mark JW begins his commentary on some of our recently published blog posts. After listening to his commentary I struck with a kind of thankfulness. So I thought I would take today’s post and thankContinue reading “Thank You, James White”

In this episode Drs. Van Kleeck conclude their commentary on Van Kleeck’s opening statement.

Here is the beginning of our debate commentary. Lord willing I will be able to do some quick edits and then have a video up each day this week. Given the length of the debate and subsequent commentary, this series should last through next week. We’ll have to see how it goes.

Thus far, having read critiques of my debate performance, two complaints have arisen: 1.) I offered arguments that were unfamiliar and therefore difficult to understand. 2.) I was rude, angry, condescending, and/or had a chip on my shoulder. I already addressed #1 in this blog post so let’s turn to the second complaint. As theContinue reading “Van Kleeck Was Rude”

So it has been one week since the debate with Dr. White. As it currently stands there are almost 22,000 views of the debate so far. Several people have contacted me to say that they watch the debate live and then went back to watch it again and in so doing gleaned further insights intoContinue reading “The Gauntlet: An Official Call for Discussion and Debate”