Series 3, Lecture 14: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Role of B. B. Warfield

Tonight 9/5 at 7:30 we will hold the thirteenth lecture of series three on “A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text –The Role of B..B. Warfield Leading up to the national implications of replacing Scripture with history in Germany, was the wide-ranging impact of this theological transition in the lectures of Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield,Continue reading “Series 3, Lecture 14: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Role of B. B. Warfield”

Series 3, Lecture 14: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — God’s Singular Care and Providence and the Sacred Apographa

Tonight 8/29 at 7:30 we will hold the thirteenth lecture of series three on “A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text –God’s Singular Care and Providence and the Sacred Apographa Eighty-eight years earlier, in book 2, chapter 16, of the Institutes, Calvin discussed the pivotal role played by the providence of God. He concludesContinue reading “Series 3, Lecture 14: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — God’s Singular Care and Providence and the Sacred Apographa”

Series 3, Lecture 13: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Doctrine of Immediate Inspiration and the Issue of Dictation

Tonight 8/22 at 7:30 we will hold the thirteenth lecture of series three on “A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text –The issue of Dictation Lamothe likewise writes, “When the Old Testament is cited by the Apostles, they usually call it the Scripture by way of excellency; as when St. Paul, speaking of anContinue reading “Series 3, Lecture 13: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Doctrine of Immediate Inspiration and the Issue of Dictation”

Series 3, Lecture 12: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Doctrine of Immediate Inspiration and a Standard Sacred Text, part 3

Tonight 8/15 at 7:30 we will hold the twelfth lecture of series three on “A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text –The Doctrine of Immediate Inspiration and a Standard Sacred Text , part 3.” The Apologetic Aspect of Inspiration             The formulation of the doctrine of inspiration is in large part been an apologeticContinue reading “Series 3, Lecture 12: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Doctrine of Immediate Inspiration and a Standard Sacred Text, part 3”

Series 3, Lecture 11: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Doctrine of Immediate Inspiration and a Standard Sacred Text, part 2

Tonight 8/8 at 7:30 we will hold the eleventh lecture of series three on “A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text –The Doctrine of Immediate Inspiration and a Standard Sacred Text , part 2.” The Apologetic Aspect of Inspiration             The formulation of the doctrine of inspiration is in large part been an apologeticContinue reading “Series 3, Lecture 11: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Doctrine of Immediate Inspiration and a Standard Sacred Text, part 2”

Series 3, Lecture 8: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Holy Spirit and a Standard Sacred Text, part 2

Tonight 7/181 at 7:30 we will hold the eighth lecture of series three on “A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Holy Spirit and a Standard Sacred Text, part 2.” William Bucanus Served as professor of theology at Lausanne from 1591 to 1603. His major dogmatic work was the Institutes of theContinue reading “Series 3, Lecture 8: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Holy Spirit and a Standard Sacred Text, part 2”

Series 3, Lecture 7: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Holy Spirit and a Standard Sacred Text

Tonight 7/11 at 7:30 we will hold the seventh lecture of series three on “A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Holy Spirit and a Standard Sacred Text.” Henry Venn (1724-1797), the Anglican rector of Huddersfield in Yorkshire and later of Yelling in Huntingdonshire, was the author of the once well-known bookContinue reading “Series 3, Lecture 7: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Holy Spirit and a Standard Sacred Text”

Series 3, Lecture 6: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Unquantifiability of Manuscript Transmission and Canonical Collation

Tonight 6/27 at 7:30 we will hold the sixth lecture of series three on “A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Unquantifiability of Manuscript Transmission and Canonical Collation.”             The process by which the words of the Canon were collated cannot be classified, categorized, or easily referenced because, as we have seen,Continue reading “Series 3, Lecture 6: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — The Unquantifiability of Manuscript Transmission and Canonical Collation”

Series 3, Lecture 5: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — Canonicity: Historical Overview and the Failure of External Criteria

Tonight 6/20 at 7:30 we will hold the fifth lecture of series three on “A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — Canonicity: Historical Overview and the Failure of External Criteria “ The Muratorian Canon (175-225 AD)  was the earliest official list produced by the Church. It was not sanctioning a canon but recognizing aContinue reading “Series 3, Lecture 5: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text — Canonicity: Historical Overview and the Failure of External Criteria”

Series 3, Lecture 4: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text: The Theocentricity of the Canon

Tonight 6/13 at 7:30 we will hold the fourth lecture of series three on “A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text: The Theocentricity of the Canon“ Presbyterian scholar and Westminster Professor John Murray articulates the “imprints” of God’s Authorship upon Scripture, writing, “If, as has been shown in the earlier part of this discussion,Continue reading “Series 3, Lecture 4: A Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text: The Theocentricity of the Canon”