Author Archives: Peter Van Kleeck Jr. Ph.D.

Was B.B. Warfield’s View of the Autograph the Same as the Protestant Orthodox?

To answer this question Richard Muller [PRRD, Holy Scripture, pp. 413-414] observes, The case for Scripture as an infallible rule of faith and practice and the separate argument for a received text free from major (i.e., non-scribal) errors rests on an examination of the apographa [i.e., copies of copies] and does not seek the infiniteContinue reading “Was B.B. Warfield’s View of the Autograph the Same as the Protestant Orthodox?”

Reaching the Next Generation

A couple of weeks ago I had the pleasure of sitting down with three students from Virginia Tech. These students attend my Church. They are reformed in theology and presuppositional in their evangelism. Somehow they came across the debate I had with Dr. White and having listened to the debate they had a series ofContinue reading “Reaching the Next Generation”

Authoritas Divina Duplex (Repost)

“twofold divine authority; a distinction between (1) the authoritas rerum, or authority of the things of Scripture, the substantia doctrinae (substance of doctrine); and (2) the authroitas verborum, or authority of the words of Scripture arising from the accidens scriptionis, the accident of writing.” Richard Muller, Dictionary of Latin and Greek Theological Terms: Drawn PrincipallyContinue reading “Authoritas Divina Duplex (Repost)”

Apologetic relevance of the Textus Receptus by Robert Paul Weiland

Weiland passed away some years ago and so his YouTube channel is not being monitored/updated. Still, his content was and is in so many ways spot on. I am considering sharing all of his stuff here so that we can bring his material back into the light. In this video Weiland addresses what looks likeContinue reading “Apologetic relevance of the Textus Receptus by Robert Paul Weiland”