For an upcoming work by Dr.s Peter Van Kleeck, we would like to know what you think are the most potent theological and philosophical objections to the Confessional Text/Standard Sacred Text position on the Scriptures – the more complex and broad-reaching the better. Certainly, there are objections but what are those which wholly defeat our position or cripple it. This question is open to those who agree and those who disagree with our position.
Please be as thorough and as precise as possible. There are in the main two kinds of objections you could argue: 1.) there is some proposition asserted by us to which you have a defeater – undercutting or rebutting 2.) there is something we failed to address which is integral to the greater system touching the originals and version issue.
The reason for putting this question out to the public in this way is because we would like to address these objections considered to be the most potent without presenting them as a strawman. We would like to address these proposed objections as presented in their greatest force and precision.
Thank you for your assistance and input in these regards,
The StandardSacredText.com Team